Talk:Main Page
From Eclipsed
(crap...) |
m (Suggestion) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page | http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page | ||
It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --[[User:Sidney|Sidney]] 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT) | It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --[[User:Sidney|Sidney]] 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli | ||
| + | :I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::I agree that the "two wiki's are way too many" concept isn't really a good thing. I think there can be plenty of wikis. The people who manage a wiki can end up making or breaking a wiki so there's no need to rely on just one. It's like natural selection, the one that's best suited will thrive. As for heroeswiki being Wikipedia content cut and pasted it was like that originally, but a lot of the Wikipedia content was rewritten so most of it is new now. -[[User:Stealth|Stealth]] 10:20, 25 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Suggestion == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The main page should really be protected, to prevent vandalism.--[[User:Ac1983fan|Ac1983fan]] 07:59, 27 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
Current revision as of 11:59, 27 October 2006
Why are we using pics via a URl? we can jsut upload it here.--Ac1983fan 11:48, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
we should really
split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--Ac1983fan 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT) --
I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....
character name played by actor name
-maylith
--
I don't want to do this unless we have enough information to constitute it. When someone created actor pages they were just one sentence. No reason to have a multitude of pages with one sentence and the filmography. Until then it can stay on the character page. Plus, that is kind of why there's a Table of Contents.
--Vote Petrelli
- Well, I could work on the actor pages. Also, guys, make sure to sign your posts with ~~~~.--Ac1983fan 08:21, 24 October 2006 (EDT)
Crap...
http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --Sidney 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT)
Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli
- I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--Ac1983fan 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
- I agree that the "two wiki's are way too many" concept isn't really a good thing. I think there can be plenty of wikis. The people who manage a wiki can end up making or breaking a wiki so there's no need to rely on just one. It's like natural selection, the one that's best suited will thrive. As for heroeswiki being Wikipedia content cut and pasted it was like that originally, but a lot of the Wikipedia content was rewritten so most of it is new now. -Stealth 10:20, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
Suggestion
The main page should really be protected, to prevent vandalism.--Ac1983fan 07:59, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
