Devaria:Etiquette

From Devaria

(Difference between revisions)
(JqI82T wow, awesome article. Really Cool.)
Line 3: Line 3:
Devaria's contributors come from many different countries and cultures. We have many different views, perspectives, opinions, and backgrounds, sometimes varying widely. Treating others with respect is key to collaborating effectively in building an international online nanonation.
Devaria's contributors come from many different countries and cultures. We have many different views, perspectives, opinions, and backgrounds, sometimes varying widely. Treating others with respect is key to collaborating effectively in building an international online nanonation.
-
== Principles of Devaria etiquette ==
+
JqI82T wow, awesome article. Really Cool.
-
 
+
-
* Assume good faith. Devaria has worked on nanonation based on a policy of nearly complete freedom to edit and put views foward. People come here to collaborate and write good articles.
+
-
* Treat others as you would have them treat you – even if they are new. We were all new once...
+
-
* Be polite, please!
+
-
** Keep in mind that raw text is ambiguous and often seems ruder than the same words coming from a person standing in front of you. Irony isn't always obvious - text comes without facial expressions, vocal inflection or body language. Be careful of the words you choose – what you intended might not be what others perceive, and what you read might not be what the author intended.
+
-
:* If you have not registered yourself, do not construct a signature that might make it appear that you have.
+
-
* Work toward agreement.
+
-
* Argue facts, not personalities.
+
-
* Don't ignore questions.
+
-
** If another disagrees with your edit, provide good reasons why you think it's appropriate.
+
-
* Concede a point when you have no response to it.
+
-
* Be civil.
+
-
* Although it's understandably difficult in a heated argument, if other ministers are not as civil as you'd like them to be, make sure to be '''more''' civil than them, not less. That way at least you're not spiralling down to open conflict and name-calling by your own accord; you're actively doing something about it: taking a hit and refraining from hitting back – everybody appreciates that (or at least they should).
+
-
** However, don't hesitate to let the other party know that you're not comfortable with their tone in a neutral way – otherwise they might think you're too dense to understand their "subtlety", and you'll involuntarily encourage them (e.g. "I know you've been sarcastic above, but I don't think that's helping us resolve the issue. However, I don't think your argument stands because...").
+
-
* Be prepared to apologize. In animated discussions, we often say things we later wish we hadn't. Say so.
+
-
* Forgive and forget.
+
-
* Recognize your own biases and keep them in check.
+
-
* Give praise when due. Everybody likes to feel appreciated, especially in an environment that often requires compromise. Drop a friendly note on users' talk pages.
+
-
* Remove or summarize resolved disputes that you initiated.
+
-
* Help mediate disagreements between others.
+
-
* If you're arguing, take a break. If you're mediating, recommend a break.
+
-
** Take it slowly. If you're angry, take time out instead of posting or editing. Come back in a day or a week. You might find that someone else has made the desired change or comment for you. If no one is mediating, and you think mediation is needed, enlist someone.
+
-
** Walk away or find another Devaria article or issue to distract yourself – remember there are {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} articles on Devaria. Take up a [[Devaria:GovProject|Govproject]] or lend to new comers.
+
-
* Avoid reverts and deletions whenever possible. Explain reversions in the edit summary box.
+
-
** Amend and edit.
+
-
* Remind yourself that these are ''people'' you're dealing with. They are individuals with feelings and probably have other people in the world who love them. Try to treat others with dignity.
+
-
* Remember the Golden Rule: "treat others as you want them to treat you."
+
== How to avoid abuse of talk pages ==
== How to avoid abuse of talk pages ==

Revision as of 04:41, 9 March 2012

This page offers some principles of etiquette on how to work with others in Devaria. You can read about more basic conventions at the Policy page.

Devaria's contributors come from many different countries and cultures. We have many different views, perspectives, opinions, and backgrounds, sometimes varying widely. Treating others with respect is key to collaborating effectively in building an international online nanonation.

JqI82T wow, awesome article. Really Cool.

How to avoid abuse of talk pages

  • Most people take pride in their work and in their point of view. Egos can easily get hurt in editing, but talk pages are not a place for striking back. They're a good place to comfort or undo damage to egos, but most of all they're for forging agreements that are best for the articles they're attached to. If someone disagrees with you, try to understand why, and in your discussion on the talk pages take the time to provide good reasons why you think your way is better.
  • Don't label' people or their edits.
    • Terms like "racist", "sexist" or even "poorly written" make people defensive. This makes it hard to discuss articles productively. If you have to criticize, you must do it in a polite and constructive manner.
  • Always make clear what point you are addressing, especially in replies.
    • In responding, make it clear what idea you are responding to. Quoting a post is O.K., but paraphrasing it or stating how you interpreted it is better. Furthermore, qualify your interpretation with a remark such as "as you seem to be saying" or "as I understand you" to acknowledge that you are making an interpretation. Before proceeding to say that someone is wrong, concede you might have misinterpreted him or her.
    • Interweaving rebuttals into the middle of another person's comments, however, is generally a bad idea. It disrupts the flow of the discussion and breaks the attribution of comments. It may be intelligible to the two of you, but it's virtually impossible for the rest of the community to follow.
Personal tools