Comments
From Cybersecession
m (Comments moved to Criticism) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''There is no such thing as a "cyberspace enclave" that can't affect the material world. Everything that happens there will actually affect the material world very much. Think of an online portal run by terrorists where they can get together and plan attacks etc. or simply keep in touch and share feelings. How can you find out who they are if you insure anonymity for everybody?''' | '''There is no such thing as a "cyberspace enclave" that can't affect the material world. Everything that happens there will actually affect the material world very much. Think of an online portal run by terrorists where they can get together and plan attacks etc. or simply keep in touch and share feelings. How can you find out who they are if you insure anonymity for everybody?''' | ||
| - | Heh. Strong point. But this is exactly where our concept shows it's strength. All of us might have "terrorist" thoughts once in a while. Some people imagine raping other people or being raped, for instance. Some even desire to destroy the Microsoft Headquarters ( | + | Heh. Strong point. But this is exactly where our concept shows it's strength. All of us might have "terrorist" thoughts once in a while. Some people imagine raping other people or being raped, for instance. Some even desire to destroy the Microsoft Headquarters (probably because they were recently fired for unjust reasons?) Will this EVER validate the gov scanning our brains? NOPE. NEVER EVER. Strong comparison, huh? |
Revision as of 00:39, 23 July 2006
I fail to understand how this is a new idea. EFF have been following similar goals for years.
Please read Cybersecession and EFF. If you will still think this idea is not new, then please let us know. We hate duplicate work.
There is no such thing as a "cyberspace enclave" that can't affect the material world. Everything that happens there will actually affect the material world very much. Think of an online portal run by terrorists where they can get together and plan attacks etc. or simply keep in touch and share feelings. How can you find out who they are if you insure anonymity for everybody?
Heh. Strong point. But this is exactly where our concept shows it's strength. All of us might have "terrorist" thoughts once in a while. Some people imagine raping other people or being raped, for instance. Some even desire to destroy the Microsoft Headquarters (probably because they were recently fired for unjust reasons?) Will this EVER validate the gov scanning our brains? NOPE. NEVER EVER. Strong comparison, huh?
