Cybersecession and EFF
From Cybersecession
(→Cybersecession and EFF) |
(a lot of changes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ==A Map of the Cyberspace== | + | ==A New Map of the Cyberspace== |
| - | + | EFF's frontline is between the Internet (which they call "Cyberspace") and the political world. Thus they promise to do their best to defend the whole Internet from political abuse. | |
| - | Cybersecession goes further | + | The Cybersecession initiative goes further by theoretically enforcing a distinction between the Internet and the Cyberspace. Cybersecession means it is only the Internet that needs to be protected by EFF, while the Cyberspace is naturally "as free as human imagination" and so it should stay forever. |
| - | Cybersecession | + | Cybersecession concedes (perhaps more indulgently than EFF) that there may be valid legal concerns around the Internet, since it affects the material world, but contends (much more radically than EFF) that such issues have nothing to do with the Cyberspace, so they imply no obligation whatsoever to tolerate any Cyberspace regulations. The better strategy is to thoroughly separate the Cyberspace from the Internet and fight on two different fronts and in two different ways. |
==Cybersecession and EFF== | ==Cybersecession and EFF== | ||
| - | As | + | As implied on the [[Main Page]], EFF don't emphasize any strict distinction between administrative privacy and personal privacy. This confusion may be smart and aggressive enough for fighting authoritarian governments intruding the Internet, but not sensitive enough to make us feel at home in our Cyberspace. On the other side, distinguishing between two types of privacy is essential to the Cybersecession initiative. So EFF's "electronic frontiers" to be defended are completely different from Cybersecession's. The two have different purposes and approaches. |
| - | EFF fight in the frontline, protecting us all (including our "home") from | + | EFF fight in the frontline, protecting us all (including our "home") from the bad guys. Meanwhile, cybersecessionists are defining which part of the Internet is actually under attack and which part of it is (and will always be) naturally safe. The Cybersecession Project is thus defining and validating a safe digital land where we could really feel "at home". /// Indeed, we have a home. Some ambiguously call it "the Internet" (the immaterial world supported by the computers). But do we actually care about sectors run by banks or three-letter agencies? No, that's not the Internet we love or care about. That's not the Cyberspace, our home. |
| - | It's cool that the EFF's frontline is far away from our home. It's cool that EFF exists to defend the Internet, and not Cyberspace. But it is also | + | It's cool that the EFF's frontline is so far away from our home. It's cool that EFF exists to defend the Internet, and not the Cyberspace. But it is also cool that we can initiate a Cybersecession defining a place nobody can intrude ethically and legally. It's cool that Cybersecession defines a "Cyberland" that is safe by definition (so it doesn't need defense). |
| - | + | The Cybersecession initiative makes sure it is only the Internet that is ethically vulnerable to political intrusion and needs legal war (EFF). It makes sure '''we''', not the governments, decide/define where the Electronic Frontier should be. | |
| - | + | We can't allow the Cyberspace to disappear merely because of poor conceptualization. | |
==The Current Status of the Cyberspace== | ==The Current Status of the Cyberspace== | ||
| - | Although Cyberspace is | + | Although Cyberspace is not yet legally defined, there are essentially cybersecessionist projects, which create a free Internet zone similar to Cyberspace but enforced technologically. They are collectively labeled "Cypherspace", as they are based on cryptography for hiding the identity of their users. You may visit the Cybersecession [http://editthis.info/cybersecession/cybersecession:Community_Portal Community Portal] to find out about such projects. |
Revision as of 20:48, 11 November 2010
A New Map of the Cyberspace
EFF's frontline is between the Internet (which they call "Cyberspace") and the political world. Thus they promise to do their best to defend the whole Internet from political abuse.
The Cybersecession initiative goes further by theoretically enforcing a distinction between the Internet and the Cyberspace. Cybersecession means it is only the Internet that needs to be protected by EFF, while the Cyberspace is naturally "as free as human imagination" and so it should stay forever.
Cybersecession concedes (perhaps more indulgently than EFF) that there may be valid legal concerns around the Internet, since it affects the material world, but contends (much more radically than EFF) that such issues have nothing to do with the Cyberspace, so they imply no obligation whatsoever to tolerate any Cyberspace regulations. The better strategy is to thoroughly separate the Cyberspace from the Internet and fight on two different fronts and in two different ways.
Cybersecession and EFF
As implied on the Main Page, EFF don't emphasize any strict distinction between administrative privacy and personal privacy. This confusion may be smart and aggressive enough for fighting authoritarian governments intruding the Internet, but not sensitive enough to make us feel at home in our Cyberspace. On the other side, distinguishing between two types of privacy is essential to the Cybersecession initiative. So EFF's "electronic frontiers" to be defended are completely different from Cybersecession's. The two have different purposes and approaches.
EFF fight in the frontline, protecting us all (including our "home") from the bad guys. Meanwhile, cybersecessionists are defining which part of the Internet is actually under attack and which part of it is (and will always be) naturally safe. The Cybersecession Project is thus defining and validating a safe digital land where we could really feel "at home". /// Indeed, we have a home. Some ambiguously call it "the Internet" (the immaterial world supported by the computers). But do we actually care about sectors run by banks or three-letter agencies? No, that's not the Internet we love or care about. That's not the Cyberspace, our home.
It's cool that the EFF's frontline is so far away from our home. It's cool that EFF exists to defend the Internet, and not the Cyberspace. But it is also cool that we can initiate a Cybersecession defining a place nobody can intrude ethically and legally. It's cool that Cybersecession defines a "Cyberland" that is safe by definition (so it doesn't need defense).
The Cybersecession initiative makes sure it is only the Internet that is ethically vulnerable to political intrusion and needs legal war (EFF). It makes sure we, not the governments, decide/define where the Electronic Frontier should be.
We can't allow the Cyberspace to disappear merely because of poor conceptualization.
The Current Status of the Cyberspace
Although Cyberspace is not yet legally defined, there are essentially cybersecessionist projects, which create a free Internet zone similar to Cyberspace but enforced technologically. They are collectively labeled "Cypherspace", as they are based on cryptography for hiding the identity of their users. You may visit the Cybersecession Community Portal to find out about such projects.
