Index.php
From Cellbe
(Replaced content with 'We couldn't load that page. Please try again or contact support.') |
(→and even the roof platform access to &ldquo &rdquo: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We couldn't load that page. Please try again or contact support. | We couldn't load that page. Please try again or contact support. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == and even the roof platform access to &ldquo &rdquo == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [case],<br>In August 4th,moncler pas cher, Chifeng City People's Court concluded with AO Hanqi because developers will meet a business hall roof gifts for others and caused property damage compensation dispute cases.<br>In 2010, sun X were purchased from a construction company limited development in Aohan banner town Hui Ning Road in a residential area next to the street in a business hall, the hall with a layer of commercial residential building is behind.<br>In May 26th of this year, due to business hall roof water leakage,doudoune moncler pas cher, so the view that sun roof waterproof surface do not know when it was Caizhuan instead.After inquiry knowing developers a Construction Company Limited has business hall roof presented to the two adjacent floor tenants Han as a certain use of the balcony, and signed a gift agreement.<br>Helpless,moncler pas cher, sun X in June 22, 2011 will be South Korea XX and developers a construction company limited also appeals to to the court,www.hollistercopa, requirement the accused to confirm the two Sign Gift agreement is invalid, and the business hall roof waterproofing.<br><br>The court mediation,, developers recognize privately to the plaintiff purchased commercial hall roof gifts for others to use,doudoune moncler, violated the legal rights of the plaintiff, ultimately the parties voluntarily agree as follows: lifting the defendant a construction company limited and the Han XX between about giving away commercial hall roof access agreement; the defendant a Construction Company Limited benefits the sun a cost 2000 yuan, by the plaintiff to the business hall roof waterproofing and repair business hall due to water leakage caused roof damage; the disposable address, subject matter produced by other compensation matters,louboutin pas cher, both sides accused each other for the future,doudoune moncler.<br><br>Statement.<br>Chifeng City Ao Hanqi civil court trial two judge Pan Yahui: the &ldquo ” gift,louboutin; as the promotion means the phenomenon in the current real estate industry more generally, the resulting due to &ldquo ” gift; and on the other the purchase of building roof using the right infringement dispute also emerge in an endless stream,abercrombie france.<br><br>In recent years, in the purchase process, on the roof space ownership problems often appear.In accordance with the provisions of the distinction between ownership of the building, the roof of a building space should belong to all owners have in common,.<br>In the present case, the controversy is the underlying business hall roof platform &ldquo,abercrombie, &rdquo,michael kors outlet; cover; plays a cover, shelter, remove heavy rain snow and heat insulation function.It belongs to the business owners have exclusive use of the hall,air jordan pas cher.<br>Therefore, from the perspective of ownership,, business hall in the sale, the roof has been owned by the owners of all business hall.In this case,hollister, developers are not entitled to the right to the use of roof platform to be disposed of, and even the roof platform access to &ldquo ” gift; fashion into a commodity to boost profits.<br>So, buy a house with roof terrace developers “ ” belongs to the invalid provision,doudoune moncler pas cher, and the lawful rights and interests of others “ gift agreement ” certainly not supported by law,moncler pas cher.<br>At the same time property buyers to meet “ buy a house with roof terrace ” situation, must study seriously is in accordance with the law after the decision, in cogent safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but also will not infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of others,.<br>Related articles: | ||
| + | <ul> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <li>Netease sports reported on April 23rd</li> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <li>Anhui 38800000000 yuan into this project for people</li> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <li>good line maintenance</li> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ul> | ||
| + | The reporter also try to send a falling out of love ,this letter is God , I will always be with you, you will not be lonely . Reporter sends a true , Yeah, right .The reporter said thank you ,the answer is this is what I should do, don . | ||
Revision as of 02:23, 30 November 2012
We couldn't load that page. Please try again or contact support.
and even the roof platform access to &ldquo &rdquo
[case],
In August 4th,moncler pas cher, Chifeng City People's Court concluded with AO Hanqi because developers will meet a business hall roof gifts for others and caused property damage compensation dispute cases.
In 2010, sun X were purchased from a construction company limited development in Aohan banner town Hui Ning Road in a residential area next to the street in a business hall, the hall with a layer of commercial residential building is behind.
In May 26th of this year, due to business hall roof water leakage,doudoune moncler pas cher, so the view that sun roof waterproof surface do not know when it was Caizhuan instead.After inquiry knowing developers a Construction Company Limited has business hall roof presented to the two adjacent floor tenants Han as a certain use of the balcony, and signed a gift agreement.
Helpless,moncler pas cher, sun X in June 22, 2011 will be South Korea XX and developers a construction company limited also appeals to to the court,www.hollistercopa, requirement the accused to confirm the two Sign Gift agreement is invalid, and the business hall roof waterproofing.
The court mediation,, developers recognize privately to the plaintiff purchased commercial hall roof gifts for others to use,doudoune moncler, violated the legal rights of the plaintiff, ultimately the parties voluntarily agree as follows: lifting the defendant a construction company limited and the Han XX between about giving away commercial hall roof access agreement; the defendant a Construction Company Limited benefits the sun a cost 2000 yuan, by the plaintiff to the business hall roof waterproofing and repair business hall due to water leakage caused roof damage; the disposable address, subject matter produced by other compensation matters,louboutin pas cher, both sides accused each other for the future,doudoune moncler.
Statement.
Chifeng City Ao Hanqi civil court trial two judge Pan Yahui: the &ldquo ” gift,louboutin; as the promotion means the phenomenon in the current real estate industry more generally, the resulting due to &ldquo ” gift; and on the other the purchase of building roof using the right infringement dispute also emerge in an endless stream,abercrombie france.
In recent years, in the purchase process, on the roof space ownership problems often appear.In accordance with the provisions of the distinction between ownership of the building, the roof of a building space should belong to all owners have in common,.
In the present case, the controversy is the underlying business hall roof platform &ldquo,abercrombie, &rdquo,michael kors outlet; cover; plays a cover, shelter, remove heavy rain snow and heat insulation function.It belongs to the business owners have exclusive use of the hall,air jordan pas cher.
Therefore, from the perspective of ownership,, business hall in the sale, the roof has been owned by the owners of all business hall.In this case,hollister, developers are not entitled to the right to the use of roof platform to be disposed of, and even the roof platform access to &ldquo ” gift; fashion into a commodity to boost profits.
So, buy a house with roof terrace developers “ ” belongs to the invalid provision,doudoune moncler pas cher, and the lawful rights and interests of others “ gift agreement ” certainly not supported by law,moncler pas cher.
At the same time property buyers to meet “ buy a house with roof terrace ” situation, must study seriously is in accordance with the law after the decision, in cogent safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but also will not infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of others,.
Related articles:
- Netease sports reported on April 23rd
- Anhui 38800000000 yuan into this project for people
- good line maintenance
The reporter also try to send a falling out of love ,this letter is God , I will always be with you, you will not be lonely . Reporter sends a true , Yeah, right .The reporter said thank you ,the answer is this is what I should do, don .
