Index.php
From Cellbe
(→their legal counsel: new section) |
|||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
There is no doubt that file hosting service is the most dependable and easy way to share and host your files. | There is no doubt that file hosting service is the most dependable and easy way to share and host your files. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == their legal counsel == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some 17 comfort women, victims of sexual slavery during World War II, went to the Supreme Court on Monday to assail a supposedly plagiarized ruling that junked their plea three months ago. In a supplemental motion for reconsideration, the comfort women asked the high court to rethink the allegedly "plagiarized" ruling it issued on April 28,jordan, 2010 penned by Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo. In 2004, some 60 comfort women filed the “Vinuya v. Executive Secretary" case,air jordan, petitioning the Philippine government to compel Japan to make a public apology and provide compensation for them,franklin and marshall.However, an SC decision on April 28, 2010 denied the women's petition. Former "comfort women" ask the SC to reconsider its April 28, 2010 ruling which allegedly has portions that were plagiarized from foreign sources. Sophia Dedace Part of the SC's 34-page decision said: "Regrettably, it is not within our power to order the Executive Department to take up the petitioners’ cause,hollister france. Ours is only the power to urge and exhort the Executive Department to take up petitioners’ cause."The women, who call themselves the "Malaya Lolas" or Liberation Grandmothers, said the SC's decision contains alleged plagiarized portions taken out of context to support the arguments for denying their petition. "Kayong mga mahistrado ng Supreme Court, kayo na nga ay nangopya, binaluktot niyo pa. Kung hindi niyo maibigay sa amin ang hustisya, dapat mag-resign na kayo (Justices of the Supreme Court, you not only copied, you even twisted [texts from other law cases]. If you cannot give us justice, you should resign," said an emotional Pilar Galang, 80 years old. "Pinatay ang tatay ko at ang kapatid ko. Pinagsamantalahan kami [mga comfort women]. Bakit hindi kami pinapansin ng gobyerno? Bakit walang kalinga sa amin (My father and brother were killed. We [comfort women] were raped. Why is the government ignoring us,abercrombie? Why is there no compassion for us?)," she said in between sobs. She and some of her companions shed tears when they filed the motion for reconsideration, saying they have been clamoring for justice for more than 60 years now.In the motion for reconsideration,michael kors outlet, their legal counsel, University of the Philippines law professor Harry Roque Jr., wrote: "It is thus every lawyer’s serious and urgent concern that this Honorable Court address and disclose to the public the truth about the manifest intellectual theft and outright plagiarism discovered (and discoverable by the rest of the world) from the Court’s published Judgment, which did not only twist the content of such texts, but worse, resulted in gross prejudice to Petitioners,abercrombie france." In a separate interview with reporters, Roque said the purpose of the supplemental motion was to "let the court know that the ruling was plagiarized." Vinuya v,frankin marshall. Executive SecretarySince the comfort women filed the "Vinuya v. Executive Secretary" case in 2004, about 20 have already died and on Monday, only 17 were physically fit to file the motion for reconsideration,. According to the women's motion for reconsideration and a Newsbreak report, portions of the ruling were supposedly borrowed from the following sources: 31 parts of “A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens" by Ivan Criddle and Evan Fox-Decent, published last year in the Yale Journal of International Law; 24 parts of “Breaking the Silence on Rape as an International Crime" by Mark Ellis, published 2006 in the Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law,hollister; and 4 parts of “Enforcing Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law" by Christian Tams, published in 2005.The women said copyright infringement is punishable under Article 217 of the new Intellectual Property Code or Republic Act 8293. If proven guilty,michael kors, those who committed plagiarism can be imprisoned for one to three years and is required to pay a fine from P50,000 to P100,000 for the first offense. Meanwhile, Supreme Court administrator and spokesperson Jose Midas Marquez he has yet "to read the motion first' before making a comment. –VVP, GMANews,abercrombie france.TVRelated articles: | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>David Cameron starts tour of Asia</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>including Helen Skelton&rsquo</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>"At the moment he</li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | Danni and Hua Sheng Ying visual attention! By royal and Hunan satellite TV to invest in Beijing Hua Sheng Ying as the cultural Communications Limited was established at the beginning of today has gone through more than 1 years, it is Long Danni himself to the broader entertainment market explore one year. |
Revision as of 07:55, 9 December 2012
Whats the distinction?
Whilst surfing the net in order to discover free space for home video or preferred songs, users typically confuse two issues - web hosting and file hosting. So, whats the distinction? First of all, web hosting makes it possible for you to place your internet site on the internet. And file hosting offers you no cost space, where you could store what ever you want - from files to songs. So, now you can conserve your time seeking for file hosting instead of web hosting.
Keywords
First of all you must define why you need file hosting? Generally, there are four frequent sorts of files - video, images, music and data. If you are searching for any particular file hosting server, you ought to use the key phrases file upload and add the sort of file. For instance file video upload. Another very good way is to sort in SE file hosting. The finest SE in my humble opinion are Google and Yahoo! So, commence your search and Ill inform you how to deal with file-hosting services.
How to use it?
Generally, file hosting services provide you to choose a file from your hard drive. As Ive currently stated, you could pick mp3, video or any information you want. But preserve in thoughts that the file should conform to upload restrictions. The upload limit might vary from ten to 250 Mb.
And this is not the only restriction. There may possibly be upload and download speed limits, totally free space limits, and so on. But all these restrictions can be lifted if you sign up for premium account. So its up to you.
Right after uploading a file you get a link that you can keep in the closet or share. Making use of this hyperlink you can download files anytime you want.
There is no doubt that file hosting service is the most trustworthy and effortless way to share and host your files. Whats the distinction?
Although surfing the net in order to locate no cost space for home video or favorite songs, users often confuse two factors - net hosting and file hosting. So, whats the difference? Very first of all, web hosting allows you to spot your web site on the internet. And file hosting offers you free space, where you may shop whatever you want - from files to songs. So, now you can save your time hunting for file hosting instead of web hosting.
Key phrases
1st of all you need to define why you want file hosting? Essentially, there are four prevalent sorts of files - video, images, music and information. If you are hunting for any specific file hosting server, you must use the search phrases file upload and add the type of file. For example file video upload. Yet another excellent way is to type in SE file hosting. The very best SE in my humble opinion are Google and Yahoo! So, commence your search and Ill tell you how to deal with file-hosting services.
How to use it?
Typically, file hosting services provide you to choose a file from your tough drive. As Ive already mentioned, you could select mp3, video or any data you want. But keep in thoughts that the file ought to conform to upload restrictions. The upload restrict might vary from 10 to 250 Mb.
And this is not the only restriction. There may possibly be upload and download speed limits, totally free space limits, and so on. But all these restrictions can be lifted if you sign up for premium account. So its up to you.
Following uploading a file you get a link that you can preserve in the closet or share. Making use of this link you can download files whenever you want.
There is no doubt that file hosting service is the most dependable and easy way to share and host your files.
their legal counsel
Some 17 comfort women, victims of sexual slavery during World War II, went to the Supreme Court on Monday to assail a supposedly plagiarized ruling that junked their plea three months ago. In a supplemental motion for reconsideration, the comfort women asked the high court to rethink the allegedly "plagiarized" ruling it issued on April 28,jordan, 2010 penned by Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo. In 2004, some 60 comfort women filed the “Vinuya v. Executive Secretary" case,air jordan, petitioning the Philippine government to compel Japan to make a public apology and provide compensation for them,franklin and marshall.However, an SC decision on April 28, 2010 denied the women's petition. Former "comfort women" ask the SC to reconsider its April 28, 2010 ruling which allegedly has portions that were plagiarized from foreign sources. Sophia Dedace Part of the SC's 34-page decision said: "Regrettably, it is not within our power to order the Executive Department to take up the petitioners’ cause,hollister france. Ours is only the power to urge and exhort the Executive Department to take up petitioners’ cause."The women, who call themselves the "Malaya Lolas" or Liberation Grandmothers, said the SC's decision contains alleged plagiarized portions taken out of context to support the arguments for denying their petition. "Kayong mga mahistrado ng Supreme Court, kayo na nga ay nangopya, binaluktot niyo pa. Kung hindi niyo maibigay sa amin ang hustisya, dapat mag-resign na kayo (Justices of the Supreme Court, you not only copied, you even twisted [texts from other law cases]. If you cannot give us justice, you should resign," said an emotional Pilar Galang, 80 years old. "Pinatay ang tatay ko at ang kapatid ko. Pinagsamantalahan kami [mga comfort women]. Bakit hindi kami pinapansin ng gobyerno? Bakit walang kalinga sa amin (My father and brother were killed. We [comfort women] were raped. Why is the government ignoring us,abercrombie? Why is there no compassion for us?)," she said in between sobs. She and some of her companions shed tears when they filed the motion for reconsideration, saying they have been clamoring for justice for more than 60 years now.In the motion for reconsideration,michael kors outlet, their legal counsel, University of the Philippines law professor Harry Roque Jr., wrote: "It is thus every lawyer’s serious and urgent concern that this Honorable Court address and disclose to the public the truth about the manifest intellectual theft and outright plagiarism discovered (and discoverable by the rest of the world) from the Court’s published Judgment, which did not only twist the content of such texts, but worse, resulted in gross prejudice to Petitioners,abercrombie france." In a separate interview with reporters, Roque said the purpose of the supplemental motion was to "let the court know that the ruling was plagiarized." Vinuya v,frankin marshall. Executive SecretarySince the comfort women filed the "Vinuya v. Executive Secretary" case in 2004, about 20 have already died and on Monday, only 17 were physically fit to file the motion for reconsideration,. According to the women's motion for reconsideration and a Newsbreak report, portions of the ruling were supposedly borrowed from the following sources: 31 parts of “A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens" by Ivan Criddle and Evan Fox-Decent, published last year in the Yale Journal of International Law; 24 parts of “Breaking the Silence on Rape as an International Crime" by Mark Ellis, published 2006 in the Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law,hollister; and 4 parts of “Enforcing Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law" by Christian Tams, published in 2005.The women said copyright infringement is punishable under Article 217 of the new Intellectual Property Code or Republic Act 8293. If proven guilty,michael kors, those who committed plagiarism can be imprisoned for one to three years and is required to pay a fine from P50,000 to P100,000 for the first offense. Meanwhile, Supreme Court administrator and spokesperson Jose Midas Marquez he has yet "to read the motion first' before making a comment. –VVP, GMANews,abercrombie france.TVRelated articles:
- David Cameron starts tour of Asia
- including Helen Skelton&rsquo
- "At the moment he
Danni and Hua Sheng Ying visual attention! By royal and Hunan satellite TV to invest in Beijing Hua Sheng Ying as the cultural Communications Limited was established at the beginning of today has gone through more than 1 years, it is Long Danni himself to the broader entertainment market explore one year.