Political parties

From Bolivian Politics

(Difference between revisions)
m (Political Parties moved to Political parties)
Line 1: Line 1:
Bolivia's political party system was, until recently, dominated by three parties: [[MNR]], [[ADN]], [[MIR]]. These three provided presidents in each post-transition election; they occupy a [[centrist]] position. The poor showing of 2002 ADN brought questions about the party's continued relevance.
Bolivia's political party system was, until recently, dominated by three parties: [[MNR]], [[ADN]], [[MIR]]. These three provided presidents in each post-transition election; they occupy a [[centrist]] position. The poor showing of 2002 ADN brought questions about the party's continued relevance.
-
Three major [[populist]] parties emerged in the 1990s: [[Condepa]], [[UCS]], [[NFR]]. The 2002 Condepa showing suggests the party has no future.
+
Three major [[neopopulist]] parties emerged in the 1990s: [[Condepa]], [[UCS]], [[NFR]]. The 2002 Condepa showing suggests the party has no future.
Bolivia's ideological left is traditionally weak, and split into three broad categories: [[katarismo]], [[syndicalist]], [[social-democrat]]. By the 2000s, the most significant party in the [[syndicalist]] tradition was [[MAS]]; the most significant party in the [[katarismo]] tradition was [[MIP]]; the most significant party in the [[social-democrat]] tradition was [[MBL]].
Bolivia's ideological left is traditionally weak, and split into three broad categories: [[katarismo]], [[syndicalist]], [[social-democrat]]. By the 2000s, the most significant party in the [[syndicalist]] tradition was [[MAS]]; the most significant party in the [[katarismo]] tradition was [[MIP]]; the most significant party in the [[social-democrat]] tradition was [[MBL]].

Revision as of 21:47, 22 July 2006

Bolivia's political party system was, until recently, dominated by three parties: MNR, ADN, MIR. These three provided presidents in each post-transition election; they occupy a centrist position. The poor showing of 2002 ADN brought questions about the party's continued relevance.

Three major neopopulist parties emerged in the 1990s: Condepa, UCS, NFR. The 2002 Condepa showing suggests the party has no future.

Bolivia's ideological left is traditionally weak, and split into three broad categories: katarismo, syndicalist, social-democrat. By the 2000s, the most significant party in the syndicalist tradition was MAS; the most significant party in the katarismo tradition was MIP; the most significant party in the social-democrat tradition was MBL.

Bolivia's ideological right is principally limited to FSB.


Complete list: ACP, ADN, AP, ARBOL, ARENA, ASP, AUR, Condepa, Eje-Pachakuti, FNP, FPU, FRI, FSB, FSN, FULKA, FUN, Independent, IU, KND, LyJ, M-17, MAS, MBL, MCC, MFD, MIN, MIP, MIR, MKN, MNR, MNRI, MNRI-1, MNRV, MPP, MRTK, MRTKL, MSM, NFJ, NFR, PDC, PCB, PDB, PDC, POR, PS, PS-1, UCS, VSB, VR-9.


It is sometimes difficult to distinguish political parties from civic groups; the two often interact significantly. The above list is limited to groups that actively participate in electoral politics. For others, see Civic Groups.

Personal tools