B'nai B'rith Girls

From Wikibbyo

Revision as of 23:54, 13 February 2013 (edit) 212.179.142.194 (Talk) (sAaPhHMpPd) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 02:20, 14 February 2013 (edit) (undo) 216.182.162.105 (Talk) (qwzUtFdwhlBLr) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	It is critical, as a rlsuet, to ensure all untrusted articles and other content the fact that creates component of a niche site end up being published about the distinctive location of creation as opposed to any sort of hypersensitive written content on the fact that web-site. Untrusted content and articles can simply spoof another article on a single decent, learn statistics as a rlsuet of which usually decent, rlsuet in scripts where origin that will execute, submit styles to make sure you and additionally because of the fact that source even when they are really preserved with cross-site ask forgery attacks just by distinct bridal party, not to mention utilise every third-party methods already familiar with and also legal rights awarded fot it foundation	+	As Robert notes, you can do:svn merge -c-Xwhere X is the single reoisivn the change happened.  the -c is to specify a single reoisivn, and leading the reoisivn with a '-' indicates it should be reversed.Ash, that's just wrong!  The whole point of reoisivn control is that it should maintain a complete history of the changes to your code. The metadata associated with each change (the log message, for example) is invaluable in explaining *why* something was done, or why it was wrong.  It's one of the major problems I have with most dvcs (git, darcs, etc) solutions; it becomes possible to lose reoisivns and revise history.

---

Revision as of 02:20, 14 February 2013

As Robert notes, you can do:svn merge -c-Xwhere X is the single reoisivn the change happened. the -c is to specify a single reoisivn, and leading the reoisivn with a '-' indicates it should be reversed.Ash, that's just wrong! The whole point of reoisivn control is that it should maintain a complete history of the changes to your code. The metadata associated with each change (the log message, for example) is invaluable in explaining *why* something was done, or why it was wrong. It's one of the major problems I have with most dvcs (git, darcs, etc) solutions; it becomes possible to lose reoisivns and revise history.