A bit more topology ... for now

From Vectorcalcumb

(Difference between revisions)
(Speaking Loosely)
(General Definition of Compactness)
Line 7: Line 7:
===General Definition of Compactness===
===General Definition of Compactness===
   A set <m>A</m> is compact <m>\\leftright</m> every open "covering" of  
   A set <m>A</m> is compact <m>\\leftright</m> every open "covering" of  
-
   <m>A</m> contains a finite "sub-covering". i.e <br> <m> A \\subset bigcup{i \\in I}{}{U_i} </m>
+
   <m>A</m> contains a finite "sub-covering". i.e <br> if <m> A \\subset bigcup{i \\in I}{}{U_i} </m>, with all sets <m> U_i</m> open sets, then there exists<br> a finite set of indices
-
  if <m>A</m> is not closed.
+
<m> J = \\( i_1,...,i_m \\) \\subset I</m> such that <m> A \\subset U_{i_1} bigcup{}{} ...  bigcup{}{} U_{i_m} </m>

Revision as of 18:54, 11 February 2006

Contents

Compact Sets

Speaking Loosely

  • A compact set in <m>\\bbR</m> is any finite union of disjoint closed intervals
  • <m> A \\subset \\bbR^n</m> is compact <m>\\leftright~A</m> is closed and bounded.

Speaking Tightly :)

General Definition of Compactness

  A set <m>A</m> is compact <m>\\leftright</m> every open "covering" of 
  <m>A</m> contains a finite "sub-covering". i.e 
if <m> A \\subset bigcup{i \\in I}{}{U_i} </m>, with all sets <m> U_i</m> open sets, then there exists
a finite set of indices

<m> J = \\( i_1,...,i_m \\) \\subset I</m> such that <m> A \\subset U_{i_1} bigcup{}{} ... bigcup{}{} U_{i_m} </m>

Personal tools