Talk:Main Page
From Reydala
Discussion Format+Campaign Main Page Organizing
Hey, giving this a shot, seeing if it works.
Alright, a few issues to bring up!
First of all, the saga of trying to change the logo, but that's in big bold letters on the main page!
The next thing is about organization. With campaigns changing, the issue is how do we want to leave everything set up. Keep the new from the old all under the campaign main page, merge everything into one confusing blend, sub folders here or there? Separating the first book from the second book in their own things?
Hell, we've got the discussion page, so let's see this is useful, also if we can brainstorm the stuff that needs to be figured out!?
Also, I should mark that I'm the one who typed this.
-Kevin
I think we need to decide on a good format! I see them being used in regular wiki's all the time...let's see what TV Tropes does...
-Aknier (Because I'm paranoid about writing things down on webpages.)
-Aknier: So TV Tropes does it where the wiki name goes first, then a colon, then what you have to say. And then a line separating things. Not too different.
-Aknier: Used the "official" Wikipedia, Wiki'd a certain well known historical figure for the lulz and SCIENCE. Seems they separate things into topics. I like that, but let me know what you think.
-Aknier: Also, time stamps are cool, or something?! -21:06, 4 March 2009 (PST)
Formatting of talk pages doesen't really matter.
It really boils down to a few options as far as new campaign.
1)Make it it's own category self contained in itself (Modern & Prologue are like this now
2)Give it a whole nother main page with new categories for everything with different prefixes, or change the old categories to different names. Possibly moving the old stuff to it's own section instead.
3)Create a new wiki for it.
4)Don't seperate and just have them both use the same systems.
Tony 21:09, 4 March 2009 (PST)
My vote goes to having categories for Modern / First Campaign / Second Campaign. Obviously you can C-C-C-Cross counter link as needed, but for organizational purposes that seems to be the "cleanest" method to me.
Kevin 21:15, 4 March 2009 (PST)
Yeah, but it's nice to have a standard, y'know? Also you guys can use your native time zones, s'fine IMO~
Anyways, onto what we do...I'm for #4 myself...I agree with what Kev's suggesting.
Kiros 21:25, 4 March 20009 (PST)
