Talk:377

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
(Debate)
Line 13: Line 13:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-
 
+
I thinking I'm going to sit the fence on this one.  I think that both positions are that which do not overlap.  I think that 1 person probably could do both at the same time.  Likewise I think the Scorekeeper position is more valuable than the Judge, but this is only due to the fact that the SK is the "glue" that holds this place together.  I'd hate to see the Judge appoint someone that wouldn't be able to do that.  And as of now I do think any really wants to be SK.  It's a big responsiblity and has no perks or rewards.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 12:11, 2 March 2007 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Revision as of 17:11, 2 March 2007


Proposed by: [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 12:29, 1 March 2007 (EST)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

I suggest that debate run until 7 March 2007 at Noon EST. Wooble 12:31, 1 March 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I thinking I'm going to sit the fence on this one. I think that both positions are that which do not overlap. I think that 1 person probably could do both at the same time. Likewise I think the Scorekeeper position is more valuable than the Judge, but this is only due to the fact that the SK is the "glue" that holds this place together. I'd hate to see the Judge appoint someone that wouldn't be able to do that. And as of now I do think any really wants to be SK. It's a big responsiblity and has no perks or rewards. --Dayd 12:11, 2 March 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools