Talk:368

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 00:59, 16 January 2007 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 17:37, 16 January 2007 (view source) TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 33:		Line 33:
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add AGAINST vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add AGAINST vote}}
		+	# --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 12:37, 16 January 2007 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

---

Revision as of 17:37, 16 January 2007

Proposed by: Dayd 20:41, 9 January 2007 (EST)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 12 January 2007 (EST)
This proposal is just like the last plus/minus the changes AJF wanted. Also see rule 345 in regards to points reset T25. So hopefully everyone's happy and if you're not, you'll abstain.

Debate

Add comments

So, with the introduction of 366 governing the stages of a proposal, this means the new round would begin just as this proposal took effect and just too early for Dayd to accumulate 100 points and win as the 10 he would have gained become the first points of a new round without a winner. Or did you read that differently ;)? --Finisterre 04:18, 13 January 2007 (EST)

It's 200 points and points come before rule effect...that and all points are reset at the beginning of a round. --Dayd 21:49, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)

For

Add FOR vote

1. --Dayd 21:51, 14 January 2007 (EST)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

1. --TomFoolery 12:37, 16 January 2007 (EST)

Abstain

By the way...the abstain link leads to an against vote, so...edit the whole page and not via the abstain link... Add Abstention

1. --Finisterre 05:19, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I know its probably different for the rest of you, but I don't feel I'm ready for a new round just yet.)
2. --Tucana25 19:59, 15 January 2007 (EST) (I still don't really know that i like this much better than the last one, but at least its three months...)