Talk:362

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 18:58, 3 January 2007 (view source) Finisterre (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Current revision as of 23:15, 4 January 2007 (view source) Dayd (Talk | contribs)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-		+	I declare this proposal passed.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 18:15, 4 January 2007 (EST)
	Proposed by: --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:44, 27 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 13:44, 27 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->

---

Current revision as of 23:15, 4 January 2007

I declare this proposal passed. --Dayd 18:15, 4 January 2007 (EST)

Proposed by: --Tucana25 13:44, 27 December 2006 (EST)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary Debate for this proposal shall end Jan 1, 2007 at 00:01.

Debate is now over. Please vote. --Tucana25 22:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments "All players that are not deemed to have 'active' status shall not count against the total number of players for purposes of the quorum." I keep seeing this line everywhere. Can someone please explain why it is there? I want to see a line stating that inactive players are not considered registered voters per 326 "If a vote is called, it will end when all registered voters, as indicated on the Census as of the time the vote started, have voted..." Of course I tried this, but no one liked the idea. --Dayd 21:43, 27 December 2006 (EST)

I'd like to see inactive players fined something along the lines of a point a week, until they reach a set number and become 'dormant', or 'extinct'. --Finisterre 16:17, 30 December 2006 (EST)

something like that was already shot down: 350. Of course, I was hoping to connect active status with population change and that was shot down as well, so perhaps i should lay back and see what others come up with. --Tucana25 11:38, 31 December 2006 (EST)

I'm opposed to inactive players having to make a proposal to regain active status. TomFoolery 13:12, 1 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

1. --Tucana25 22:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)
2. --Dayd 21:39, 2 January 2007 (EST) (Even though I liked 337 that failed better)
3. --Finisterre 13:58, 3 January 2007 (EST)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

1. --TomFoolery 11:04, 2 January 2007 (EST)
2. chuck 12:24, 3 January 2007 (EST) (same concern as TomFoolery)

Abstain

Add Abstention