Talk:364
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate: too fast) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| + | Way too fast IMHO. How about quarterly? [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 00:33, 2 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 05:33, 2 January 2007
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary Debate will end on 12:00, 3 Junuary, 2007. This proposal is really intented to limit the ammount of work the scorekeeper has to do. After trying to backlog scoring I figure resetting it will be much easier. That and I will be giving up the most considering I have the greatest score to lose. Also this will make rounds more finite instead of lasting indifinitely. I feel that this will allow more player the potential of winning. --Dayd 01:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)
Debate
Add comments Way too fast IMHO. How about quarterly? chuck 00:33, 2 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
