Talk:352
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | + | I don't think a point award should be awarded for being Judge. I think lessen the integrity of the Judge's position. The Judge should be there because they are deemed worthy to hold the position. I might be more inclined to reward a Judge based on a popular vote after he leaves office, but even then I'm not sure I want the Judge getting points. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:09, 8 December 2006 (EST) | |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 04:09, 9 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
I don't think a point award should be awarded for being Judge. I think lessen the integrity of the Judge's position. The Judge should be there because they are deemed worthy to hold the position. I might be more inclined to reward a Judge based on a popular vote after he leaves office, but even then I'm not sure I want the Judge getting points. --Dayd 23:09, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
