325
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Rule [[311]] is hereby amended to read, in entirety: | Rule [[311]] is hereby amended to read, in entirety: | ||
- | A simple majority is required to approve any new rule. A super-majority is required to repeal or amend any rule. Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing it or by eliminating its entire effect is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass. Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing, or by eliminating part of its effect is considered an amendment of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass. | + | #A simple majority is required to approve any new rule. |
+ | #A super-majority is required to repeal or amend any rule. | ||
+ | #Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing it or by eliminating its entire effect is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass. | ||
+ | #Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing, or by eliminating part of its effect is considered an amendment of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass. |
Revision as of 16:18, 24 November 2006
|
--Tom Foolery 13:16, 23 November 2006 (EST)
Rule 311 is hereby amended to read, in entirety:
- A simple majority is required to approve any new rule.
- A super-majority is required to repeal or amend any rule.
- Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing it or by eliminating its entire effect is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.
- Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing, or by eliminating part of its effect is considered an amendment of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.