Talk:314/vote-archive-1

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 17:16, 6 November 2006 (view source) Shivan (Talk | contribs) m (User talk:Shivan/My proposal moved to Talk:314) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 17:49, 6 November 2006 (view source) Shivan (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	First off welcome to the game.  It's nice to actually see someone else here.  As of right now you and me, Dayd, are the only "currently active" players.  However I am working on that issue.  According to the rules in place it only take to players to actually play so it is workable.	+	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-	As for your proposal I'm not sure I fully support it at the moment.  I understand the reason for it, but at the same time know that not everyone is up to par with wiki-code to be able to do it with out edits.  As you can attest to your vote on proposal 313.  I suppose with practice and actually use it will become second nature, but until then it could penalize those unfamiliar with wiki enough to put them off from actually playing.	+	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
-	--[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:08, 6 November 2006 (EST)	+	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
		+	Inspired by the the [[Game-direction]] I have started the legislation on inactivity.
		+	This is a rule to deal with inactivity. It merely defines what inactivity is defined as. The 14 days which is the limit of activity is inspired by rule [[313]], which acording to rule 313 14 days is the longest time a debate is allowed to linger. I choose not to add concequences for inactivity as I felt I might break rule [[111]]. Aditionally with the definition of inactivity in this rule and rules for the concequences in later rules, the need for constant ammendment to this rule is avoided.
		+	--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 12:49, 6 November 2006 (EST)
		+	== Debate ==
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
		+	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+
		+
		+
		+	<!--END DEBATE-->
		+
		+	== Vote ==
		+	=== For ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
		+	=== Against ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
		+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+	__NOEDITSECTION__

---

Revision as of 17:49, 6 November 2006

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against

Proposer's summary and declarations

Inspired by the the Game-direction I have started the legislation on inactivity. This is a rule to deal with inactivity. It merely defines what inactivity is defined as. The 14 days which is the limit of activity is inspired by rule 313, which acording to rule 313 14 days is the longest time a debate is allowed to linger. I choose not to add concequences for inactivity as I felt I might break rule 111. Aditionally with the definition of inactivity in this rule and rules for the concequences in later rules, the need for constant ammendment to this rule is avoided. --Shivan 12:49, 6 November 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

Against

Add AGAINST vote