Talk:308
From Nomicapolis
(add debate text/for vote) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments] | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | This is a good point. | + | This is a good point. I'm for it. [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 19:34, 15 April 2006 (PDT) |
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 16 April 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Ok, this is a response to proposal 307. If we get rid of what a turn is, we should get change the term in the rule that allows "turns". Otherwise, someone might be able to make an argument for doing something wacky ("This turn, I instate 5 rules without allowing a vote on them. Voting is no longer a part of 'turns'" or something. This exact situation I believe is covered by other rules, but someone might be able to abuse the lack of clarity in what a "turn" means). I wanted to get this proposal in before 307 had been voted on, because if it passes, then an argument could be made that a turn no longer involves making a proposal, therefore proposals can no longer be made.
As is, 201 reads: "A Player may take a turn at any time. All players begin with zero points." Applejuicefool 19:55, 14 April 2006 (PDT)
Debate
Add comments This is a good point. I'm for it. sinblox 19:34, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
Vote
For
- sinblox 19:34, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
Against
