Talk:372
From Nomicapolis
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
| + | I declare this open to voting.--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 06:25, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}} | ||
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 06:25, 3 February 2007 (EST) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Revision as of 11:25, 3 February 2007
Proposed by Tucana25 23:25, 21 January 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This repeal is totally dependent on proposals 371 and 373 passing...
Debate for this proposal shall end 00:01, 29 January 2007 (EST)
311 and 334 are both now included in this proposal. They are both inserted into proposal 373. --Tucana25 19:23, 27 January 2007 (EST)
OK...just 334 now. --Tucana25 05:19, 28 January 2007 (EST)
Debate
Please do let me know what 373 is, because if we have no rule guiding what is required for a vote to pass then game play will cease since we won't be able to pass any more rules. --Dayd 23:41, 21 January 2007 (EST)
Now that I've seen 373 it doesn't address rule for passing a proposal just simply the voting and debate stages. The outright repeal of 311 should never occur. If it does the game will cease to be playable. However repealing this rule to something else such as supermajority or unanamimous voting would be suitable replacements. Granted I don't support either one, but they would at least continue to make the game playable. Even if nothing would get accomplished. --Dayd 00:46, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- I assume you meant to say 311 should not be repealed and not 373. It was my intention to gauge the response to 371 and if favorable add appropriate info to 373...i have run out of time and brainpower for the evening, but wanted to start getting it down...--Tucana25 01:03, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Sure you didn't want to get rid of 334 that one is the one that was really linked with 326. --Dayd 01:33, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- That one might also need to go...what I really wanted was to try to get everything into one rule (all 6 stages) or a few consecutive rules instead of scattered all around the ruleset with no particular order as far as the chronology of making a rule.... --Tucana25 01:44, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
I declare this open to voting.--Tucana25 06:25, 3 February 2007 (EST)
For
- --Tucana25 06:25, 3 February 2007 (EST)
Against
Abstain
