Talk:372
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
Please do let me know what [[373]] is, because if we have no rule guiding what is required for a vote to pass then game play will cease since we won't be able to pass any more rules. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:41, 21 January 2007 (EST) | Please do let me know what [[373]] is, because if we have no rule guiding what is required for a vote to pass then game play will cease since we won't be able to pass any more rules. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:41, 21 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | Now that I've seen [[373]] it doesn't address rule for passing a proposal just simply the voting and debate stages. The outright repeal of 373 should never occur. If it does the game will cease to be playable. However repealing this rule to something else such as supermajority or unanamimous voting would be suitable replacements. Granted I don't support either one, but they would at least continue to make the game playable. Even if nothing would get accomplished. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 00:46, 22 January 2007 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 05:46, 22 January 2007
Proposed by Tucana25 23:25, 21 January 2007 (EST)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This repeal is totally dependent on proposals 371 and 373 passing...
Debate for this proposal shall end 00:01, 29 January 2007 (EST)
Debate
Please do let me know what 373 is, because if we have no rule guiding what is required for a vote to pass then game play will cease since we won't be able to pass any more rules. --Dayd 23:41, 21 January 2007 (EST) Now that I've seen 373 it doesn't address rule for passing a proposal just simply the voting and debate stages. The outright repeal of 373 should never occur. If it does the game will cease to be playable. However repealing this rule to something else such as supermajority or unanamimous voting would be suitable replacements. Granted I don't support either one, but they would at least continue to make the game playable. Even if nothing would get accomplished. --Dayd 00:46, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
