Talk:362

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Debate)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
Line 8: Line 8:
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]
Debate for this proposal shall end Jan 1, 2007 at 00:01.
Debate for this proposal shall end Jan 1, 2007 at 00:01.
 +
 +
Debate is now over.  Please vote. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 22:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)
 +
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]

Revision as of 03:25, 2 January 2007


Proposed by: --Tucana25 13:44, 27 December 2006 (EST)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary Debate for this proposal shall end Jan 1, 2007 at 00:01.

Debate is now over. Please vote. --Tucana25 22:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments "All players that are not deemed to have 'active' status shall not count against the total number of players for purposes of the quorum." I keep seeing this line everywhere. Can someone please explain why it is there? I want to see a line stating that inactive players are not considered registered voters per 326 "If a vote is called, it will end when all registered voters, as indicated on the Census as of the time the vote started, have voted..." Of course I tried this, but no one liked the idea. --Dayd 21:43, 27 December 2006 (EST)

I'd like to see inactive players fined something along the lines of a point a week, until they reach a set number and become 'dormant', or 'extinct'. --Finisterre 16:17, 30 December 2006 (EST)

something like that was already shot down: 350. Of course, I was hoping to connect active status with population change and that was shot down as well, so perhaps i should lay back and see what others come up with. --Tucana25 11:38, 31 December 2006 (EST)

I'm opposed to inactive players having to make a proposal to regain active status. TomFoolery 13:12, 1 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools