Talk:361
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
Debate on this proposal will close 00:01, 01 January 2007 (EST) | Debate on this proposal will close 00:01, 01 January 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't know...maybe it's just me but I read this and it sounds like rule [[346]] or any other rule that awards points would be invaild due to this. I read your summary and don't think the rule says what you intend it to say. I think something along the way of "A rule may not be narrow in scope as to only effect the out come of its vote" or something like that. Obviously I haven't put as much thought into it as you, but I think it needs to be reworded. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 21:41, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 22 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary Proposed by: chuck 13:04, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Simple rule to prevent bribery. Right now, it only prevents the most blatant riders (e.g. "everyone who voted YES on this proposal will gain 100 points"), but it's still quite possible to introduce graft with multiple rules if you really really want it.
Debate
Add comments Debate on this proposal will close 00:01, 01 January 2007 (EST)
I don't know...maybe it's just me but I read this and it sounds like rule 346 or any other rule that awards points would be invaild due to this. I read your summary and don't think the rule says what you intend it to say. I think something along the way of "A rule may not be narrow in scope as to only effect the out come of its vote" or something like that. Obviously I haven't put as much thought into it as you, but I think it needs to be reworded. --Dayd 21:41, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
