Talk:386

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(vote temp)
(passed.)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
This proposal has passed, having gained the 2 required votes.  [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 08:54, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
{| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"
+
Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
-
|-
+
-
| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>
+
-
 
+
-
This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst:<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.
+
-
 
+
-
Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki><!--END&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line
+
-
 
+
-
Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:23, 1 May 2007 (EDT)</nowiki>
+
-
 
+
-
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
+
-
 
+
-
<!--
+
-
NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags.  It should only look like this:
+
-
 
+
-
Proposed by: (four tildes)
+
-
 
+
-
-->
+
-
(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)
+
-
|}
+
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
 +
Debate shall last until around May 7, 2007 00:01 EST
 +
 +
I don't know yet where this could go...war could affect or be a factor of luck, money, resources, population, points, popularity or something else we dream up and create some fluidity of game elements. It could even be fun as well. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
Line 29: Line 15:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|2|Add comments}}
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-
 
+
I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player".  I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship?  Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this.  In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->
== Vote ==
== Vote ==
 +
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
=== For ===
=== For ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
 +
# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 18:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}

Current revision as of 12:54, 9 May 2007

This proposal has passed, having gained the 2 required votes. Wooble 08:54, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

Proposed by --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate shall last until around May 7, 2007 00:01 EST

I don't know yet where this could go...war could affect or be a factor of luck, money, resources, population, points, popularity or something else we dream up and create some fluidity of game elements. It could even be fun as well. --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) Proposer's summary


Debate

Add comments

I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player". I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship? Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this. In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) Wooble 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. Wooble 10:05, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
  2. BobTHJ 18:27, 8 May 2007 (EDT)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools