Talk:386

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 14:58, 2 May 2007 (view source) Wooble (Talk | contribs) (→Debate: typo in propsal, comment on how this fits with existing rules) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 14:04, 8 May 2007 (view source) Wooble (Talk | contribs) (opening voting) Next diff →
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}

---

Revision as of 14:04, 8 May 2007

Proposed by --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate shall last until around May 7, 2007 00:01 EST

I don't know yet where this could go...war could affect or be a factor of luck, money, resources, population, points, popularity or something else we dream up and create some fluidity of game elements. It could even be fun as well. --Tucana25 23:29, 1 May 2007 (EDT) Proposer's summary

Debate

Add comments

I believe the first instance of "Canton" was intended to read "Player". I'm also not really sure a concept like warring with your neighbors is very well suited to such a simplistic Canton map or a residency system where each Player can move from one Canton to another at will; how can their be patriotism without enduring citizenship? Of course, both of those issues could be solved through future rules, so I don't necessarily oppose this. In fact, as a former Diplomacy player I'm thinking of ways to introduce a better map and a combat system as I write this :) Wooble 10:58, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. Wooble 10:04, 8 May 2007 (EDT)

For

Add FOR vote

Against

Add AGAINST vote

Abstain

Add Abstention