Talk:374

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
{| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"
+
I declare this proposal passed --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST)
-
|-
+
-
| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>
+
-
This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst:<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.
+
  Proposed by: [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)
-
Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki><!--END&nbsp;INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line
 
-
 
-
Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)</nowiki>
 
-
 
-
Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)
 
-
 
-
<!--
 
-
NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags.  It should only look like this:
 
-
 
-
Proposed by: (four tildes)
 
-
 
-
-->
 
-
(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)
 
-
|}
 
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
-
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}
+
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}  
 +
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST) <br>
 +
This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start.  Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive.  Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names.  Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises.  So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
Line 30: Line 16:
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself.  Lets vote on this ASAP.  I'm for it. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)
I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself.  Lets vote on this ASAP.  I'm for it. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->
== Vote ==
== Vote ==
 +
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on
=== For ===
=== For ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
-
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
+
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 +
# --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)
 +
#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}

Current revision as of 14:08, 23 January 2007

I declare this proposal passed --Dayd 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST) 

  Proposed by: Dayd 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST)
This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start. Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive. Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names. Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises. So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge. --Dayd 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --Tucana25 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--Tucana25 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)


Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Dayd 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)
  2. --Tucana25 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
  3. --Finisterre 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/Nomicapolis/Talk:374"
Personal tools