Talk:364

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Debate: too fast)
Line 6: Line 6:
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary] Debate will end on 12:00, 3 Junuary, 2007.
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary] Debate will end on 12:00, 3 Junuary, 2007.
-
This proposal is really intented to limit the ammount of work the scorekeeper has to do.  After trying to backlog scoring I figure resetting it will be much easier.  That and I will be giving up the most considering I have the greatest score to lose.  Also this will make rounds more finite instead of lasting indifinitely.  I feel that this will allow more player the potential of winning.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)
+
This proposal is really intented to limit the amount of work the scorekeeper has to do.  After trying to backlog scoring I figure resetting it will be much easier.  That and I will be giving up the most considering I have the greatest score to lose.  Also this will make rounds more finite instead of lasting indifinitely.  I feel that this will allow more player the potential of winning.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:25, 1 January 2007 (EST) <br>
 +
The reason a month was selected was because that is the current length of all position.  I figured after a round all the positions should be reselected.  I think I like Co-Nomic's idea of the winning, being granted special rights, but at the same time their point scores are handicapped making it unlikely that a person can win two rounds in a row.  It is also my opinion that we need to stop with the 0 gain and work on win win situations.  This nomic still doesn't really have a point nor a purpose, albeit the generic propose rules, vote, gains points, repeat.  So based on my monthly round things in the future will be based on this cycle to include Elections, AJF drafted population table, etc.  --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:15, 2 January 2007 (EST)
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]

Revision as of 16:15, 2 January 2007


Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary Debate will end on 12:00, 3 Junuary, 2007. This proposal is really intented to limit the amount of work the scorekeeper has to do. After trying to backlog scoring I figure resetting it will be much easier. That and I will be giving up the most considering I have the greatest score to lose. Also this will make rounds more finite instead of lasting indifinitely. I feel that this will allow more player the potential of winning. --Dayd 01:25, 1 January 2007 (EST)
The reason a month was selected was because that is the current length of all position. I figured after a round all the positions should be reselected. I think I like Co-Nomic's idea of the winning, being granted special rights, but at the same time their point scores are handicapped making it unlikely that a person can win two rounds in a row. It is also my opinion that we need to stop with the 0 gain and work on win win situations. This nomic still doesn't really have a point nor a purpose, albeit the generic propose rules, vote, gains points, repeat. So based on my monthly round things in the future will be based on this cycle to include Elections, AJF drafted population table, etc. --Dayd 11:15, 2 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments Way too fast IMHO. How about quarterly? chuck 00:33, 2 January 2007 (EST)


Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools