Talk:361
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
m (User talk:Chuck/No Preferential Treatment Draft moved to Talk:361) |
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary] | [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary] | ||
| + | Proposed by: [[User:Chuck|chuck]] 13:04, 21 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Simple rule to prevent bribery. Right now, it only prevents the most blatant riders (e.g. "everyone who voted YES on this proposal will gain 100 points"), but it's still quite possible to introduce graft with multiple rules if you really really want it. | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 21 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary Proposed by: chuck 13:04, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Simple rule to prevent bribery. Right now, it only prevents the most blatant riders (e.g. "everyone who voted YES on this proposal will gain 100 points"), but it's still quite possible to introduce graft with multiple rules if you really really want it.
Debate
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
