Talk:352
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Against) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST) | Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | I declare this proposal failed... --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 18:54, 19 December 2006 (EST) | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
| Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
# --[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 08:48, 17 December 2006 (EST) | # --[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 08:48, 17 December 2006 (EST) | ||
# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:37, 17 December 2006 (EST) | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:37, 17 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | # --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST) | ||
#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Current revision as of 23:54, 19 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
I don't think a point award should be awarded for being Judge. I think lessen the integrity of the Judge's position. The Judge should be there because they are deemed worthy to hold the position. I might be more inclined to reward a Judge based on a popular vote after he leaves office, but even then I'm not sure I want the Judge getting points. --Dayd 23:09, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --TomFoolery 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST) I declare this proposal failed... --Tucana25 18:54, 19 December 2006 (EST)
For
- --TomFoolery 08:47, 16 December 2006 (EST)
Against
- chuck 18:11, 16 December 2006 (EST)
- --Shivan 08:48, 17 December 2006 (EST)
- --Dayd 11:37, 17 December 2006 (EST)
- --Tucana25 09:03, 18 December 2006 (EST)
