Talk:308

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
Line 5: Line 5:
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
-
Ok, this is a response to proposal [[307]].  If we get rid of what a turn is, we should get change the term in the rule that allows "turns".  Otherwise, someone might be able to make an argument for doing something wacky ("This turn, I instate 5 rules without allowing a vote on them.  Voting is no longer a part of 'turns'" or something. This exact situation I believe is covered by other rules, but someone might be able to abuse the lack of clarity in what a "turn" means). I wanted to get this proposal in before [[307]] had been voted on, because if it passes, then an argument could be made that a turn no longer involves making a proposal, therefore proposals can no longer be made. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 19:55, 14 April 2006 (PDT)
+
Ok, this is a response to proposal [[307]].  If we get rid of what a turn is, we should get change the term in the rule that allows "turns".  Otherwise, someone might be able to make an argument for doing something wacky ("This turn, I instate 5 rules without allowing a vote on them.  Voting is no longer a part of 'turns'" or something. This exact situation I believe is covered by other rules, but someone might be able to abuse the lack of clarity in what a "turn" means). I wanted to get this proposal in before [[307]] had been voted on, because if it passes, then an argument could be made that a turn no longer involves making a proposal, therefore proposals can no longer be made.  
 +
 
 +
As is, [[201]] reads: "A Player may take a turn at any time. All players begin with zero points." [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 19:55, 14 April 2006 (PDT)
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]

Revision as of 02:57, 15 April 2006

Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Ok, this is a response to proposal 307. If we get rid of what a turn is, we should get change the term in the rule that allows "turns". Otherwise, someone might be able to make an argument for doing something wacky ("This turn, I instate 5 rules without allowing a vote on them. Voting is no longer a part of 'turns'" or something. This exact situation I believe is covered by other rules, but someone might be able to abuse the lack of clarity in what a "turn" means). I wanted to get this proposal in before 307 had been voted on, because if it passes, then an argument could be made that a turn no longer involves making a proposal, therefore proposals can no longer be made.

As is, 201 reads: "A Player may take a turn at any time. All players begin with zero points." Applejuicefool 19:55, 14 April 2006 (PDT)

Debate

Add comments


Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Personal tools