Vendor Comparison Table
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
! ISO 14001 | ! ISO 14001 | ||
| style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--IBM--> | | style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--IBM--> | ||
| - | || <!--Accenture--> [[Accenture_and_the_Environment#Environment:_Activities|Δ]] | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Accenture--> [[Accenture_and_the_Environment#Environment:_Activities|Δ]] |
| - | || <!--BT--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--BT--> |
| - | || <!--Capgemini--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Capgemini--> |
| - | || <!--Capita--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Capita--> |
| - | || <!--CSC--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--CSC--> |
| - | || <!--EDS--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--EDS--> |
| - | || <!--Fujitsu Services--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Fujitsu Services--> |
| - | || <!--Infosys--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Infosys--> |
| - | || <!--TCS--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--TCS--> |
| - | || <!--Wipro--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--Wipro--> |
| - | || <!--s1--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--s1--> |
| - | || <!--s2--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--s2--> |
| - | || <!--s3--> | + | || style="background:#ffdead;"| <!--s3--> |
|| <!--Dell--> | || <!--Dell--> | ||
|| <!--HP--> | || <!--HP--> | ||
Revision as of 08:24, 19 August 2007
Contents |
Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations
Ordered by type of vendor:
- IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
- Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)
| Services vendors | Hardware vendors | Software vendors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity | IB | AC | BT | CG | CT | CS | ED | FU | IS | TC | WI | s1 | s2 | s3 | DE | HP | SU | s4 | s5 | MS | OR | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 |
| ISO 14001 | style="background:#ffdead;"| Δ | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | style="background:#ffdead;"| | ||||||||||||
| Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor
Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment
Key to Vendors listed in Tables
In alphabetical order:
- AC: Accenture
- BT: BT Global Services
- CG: Capgemini
- CT: Capita
- CS: CSC
- DE: Dell
- ED: EDS
- FU: Fujitsu Services
- HP: HP
- IB: IBM
- IS: Infosys
- MS: Microsoft
- OR: Oracle
- s1: (spare)
- s2: (spare)
- .
- s9: (etc)
- SU: Sun
- TC: TCS
- WI: Wipro
