Vendor Comparison Table
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
! BT | ! BT | ||
! CG | ! CG | ||
- | + | ! CT | |
- | + | ! CS | |
- | + | ! ED | |
- | + | ! FU | |
- | + | ! IS | |
- | + | ! TC | |
- | + | ! WI | |
- | + | ! s1 | |
- | + | ! s2 | |
- | + | ! s3 | |
- | + | ! DE | |
- | + | ! HP | |
- | + | ! SU | |
- | + | ! s4 | |
- | + | ! s5 | |
- | + | ! MS | |
- | + | ! OR | |
- | + | ! s6 | |
- | + | ! s7 | |
- | + | ! s8 | |
- | + | ! s9 | |
|- | |- | ||
! ISO 14001 | ! ISO 14001 |
Revision as of 08:21, 19 August 2007
Contents |
Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations
Ordered by type of vendor:
- IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
- Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)
Services vendors | Hardware vendors | Software vendors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Activity | IB | AC | BT | CG | CT | CS | ED | FU | IS | TC | WI | s1 | s2 | s3 | DE | HP | SU | s4 | s5 | MS | OR | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 |
ISO 14001 | Δ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Activity |
Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor
Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment
Key to Vendors listed in Tables
In alphabetical order:
- AC: Accenture
- BT: BT Global Services
- CG: Capgemini
- CT: Capita
- CS: CSC
- DE: Dell
- ED: EDS
- FU: Fujitsu Services
- HP: HP
- IB: IBM
- IS: Infosys
- MS: Microsoft
- OR: Oracle
- s1: (spare)
- s2: (spare)
- .
- s9: (etc)
- SU: Sun
- TC: TCS
- WI: Wipro