Vendor Comparison Table

From Lauraibm

(Difference between revisions)
(Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations)
(Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations)
Line 13: Line 13:
|-
|-
! Activity !!style="background:#ffdead;"| IB !!
! Activity !!style="background:#ffdead;"| IB !!
-
AC  
+
AC !!
-
!! BT
+
BT !!  
-
!! CG  
+
CG  
!! CT  
!! CT  
!! CS  
!! CS  

Revision as of 08:19, 19 August 2007

Contents

Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations

Ordered by type of vendor:

  • IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
    • Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)


Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations
Services vendors Hardware vendors Software vendors
Activity IB

AC !! BT !! CG

! CT ! CS ! ED ! FU ! IS ! TC ! WI ! s1 ! s2 ! s3 ! DE ! HP ! SU ! s4 ! s5 ! MS ! OR ! s6 ! s7 ! s8 ! s9
ISO 14001 Δ
Activity

Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor

Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment

Key to Vendors listed in Tables

In alphabetical order:

  • AC: Accenture
  • BT: BT Global Services
  • CG: Capgemini
  • CT: Capita
  • CS: CSC
  • DE: Dell
  • ED: EDS
  • FU: Fujitsu Services
  • HP: HP
  • IB: IBM
  • IS: Infosys
  • MS: Microsoft
  • OR: Oracle
  • s1: (spare)
  • s2: (spare)
  • .
  • s9: (etc)
  • SU: Sun
  • TC: TCS
  • WI: Wipro
Personal tools