Vendor Comparison Table
From Lauraibm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|+ <big>'''Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations''' </big> | |+ <big>'''Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations''' </big> | ||
! | ! | ||
| - | !! colspan="14" align="center" | Services vendors | + | !! colspan="14" align="center" style="background:#ffdead;"| Services vendors |
!! colspan="5" align="center" | Hardware vendors | !! colspan="5" align="center" | Hardware vendors | ||
!! colspan="6" align="center" | Software vendors | !! colspan="6" align="center" | Software vendors | ||
Revision as of 08:16, 19 August 2007
Contents |
Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations
Ordered by type of vendor:
- IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
- Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)
| Services vendors | Hardware vendors | Software vendors | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activity | IB | AC | BT | CG | CT | CS | ED | FU | IS | TC | WI | s1 | s2 | s3 | DE | HP | SU | s4 | s5 | MS | OR | s6 | s7 | s8 | s9 |
| ISO 14001 | Δ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor
Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment
Key to Vendors listed in Tables
In alphabetical order:
- AC: Accenture
- BT: BT Global Services
- CG: Capgemini
- CT: Capita
- CS: CSC
- DE: Dell
- ED: EDS
- FU: Fujitsu Services
- HP: HP
- IB: IBM
- IS: Infosys
- MS: Microsoft
- OR: Oracle
- s1: (spare)
- s2: (spare)
- .
- s9: (etc)
- SU: Sun
- TC: TCS
- WI: Wipro
