Vendor Comparison Table

From Lauraibm

(Difference between revisions)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations)
(→Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations)
Line 8: Line 8:
|+ <big>'''Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations''' </big>
|+ <big>'''Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations''' </big>
!
!
-
!! colspan="14" align="center" | Services Vendors
+
!! colspan="14" align="center" | Services vendors
 +
!! colspan="5" align="center" | Hardware vendors
 +
!! colspan="6" align="center" | Software vendors
|-
|-
! Activity !! IB !! AC !! BT !! CG !! CT !! CS !! ED !! FU !! IS !! TC !! WI !! s1 !! s2 !! s3 !! DE !! HP !! SU !! s4 !! s5 !! MS !! OR !! s6 !! s7 !! s8 !! s9
! Activity !! IB !! AC !! BT !! CG !! CT !! CS !! ED !! FU !! IS !! TC !! WI !! s1 !! s2 !! s3 !! DE !! HP !! SU !! s4 !! s5 !! MS !! OR !! s6 !! s7 !! s8 !! s9

Revision as of 08:14, 19 August 2007

Contents

Green Measures taken by Vendors to Mitigate effects of own Operations

Ordered by type of vendor:

  • IBM first, then predominantly services vendors, then predominantly hardware vendors, then predominantly software vendors.
    • Alphabetically within vendor type (though as the spare columns become used, this will be less so)


Green Measures to Mitigate own Operations
Services vendors Hardware vendors Software vendors
Activity IB AC BT CG CT CS ED FU IS TC WI s1 s2 s3 DE HP SU s4 s5 MS OR s6 s7 s8 s9
ISO 14001 Δ
Activity

Green Offerings available to Clients of the Vendor

Activities of the Vendor that are Destructive to the Environment

Key to Vendors listed in Tables

In alphabetical order:

  • AC: Accenture
  • BT: BT Global Services
  • CG: Capgemini
  • CT: Capita
  • CS: CSC
  • DE: Dell
  • ED: EDS
  • FU: Fujitsu Services
  • HP: HP
  • IB: IBM
  • IS: Infosys
  • MS: Microsoft
  • OR: Oracle
  • s1: (spare)
  • s2: (spare)
  • .
  • s9: (etc)
  • SU: Sun
  • TC: TCS
  • WI: Wipro
Retrieved from "http://editthis.info/Lauraibm/Vendor_Comparison_Table"
Personal tools