Talk:Future children
From Kokorodatabase
(Difference between revisions)
(Bwa.) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
List votes and reasons here. Vote either TWO TERMS (Tsu) or ONE TERM (me). The first side to get... hm, how many of us are there... five votes wins. | List votes and reasons here. Vote either TWO TERMS (Tsu) or ONE TERM (me). The first side to get... hm, how many of us are there... five votes wins. | ||
| - | I, of course, vote | + | I, of course, vote ONE TERM. A future kid is a future kid. [[User:Admin|Jisu]] 16:12, 27 January 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 21:14, 27 January 2007
Include "Next-gen"?
Future children, my def=story with the kids of the canons in it, WHETHER they go to the past or stay in the future. Tsu's def=ONLY going to the past, calling set-in-the-future stories by the label "next generation".
List votes and reasons here. Vote either TWO TERMS (Tsu) or ONE TERM (me). The first side to get... hm, how many of us are there... five votes wins.
I, of course, vote ONE TERM. A future kid is a future kid. Jisu 16:12, 27 January 2007 (EST)
