Bridging
From Jsarmi
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
=Methods= | =Methods= | ||
| - | a. What is the practice | + | :a. What is the practice |
| - | b. How that practice can yield that action | + | :b. How that practice can yield that action |
| - | c. Methods for the construction, deployment and recognition | + | :c. Methods for the construction, deployment and recognition |
=Structural Significance= | =Structural Significance= | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:*Brdiging challenges "authorship" looks more like "passing of ideas" | :*Brdiging challenges "authorship" looks more like "passing of ideas" | ||
:*Trajectories are not explicit or explictly aknowledged | :*Trajectories are not explicit or explictly aknowledged | ||
| + | :*Is bridging related to "Transactive conversations" or Transacative Discusions as per X's definition | ||
Current revision as of 18:40, 18 May 2007
Contents |
Definition
Revisiting Making Allusions Reusing Reframing Reporting Reconsidering
Methods
- a. What is the practice
- b. How that practice can yield that action
- c. Methods for the construction, deployment and recognition
Structural Significance
a. Temporal/Sequential sense-making b. Knowing and Learning c. Management of Participation / Identity
Observations
- Actiosn is quick in framing past into present BUT quality of engagement is different
- Rarely we see retrospective-action-projection
- Phases? Representation, offer, Uptake, Development
- Looks like proposal work, sometimes uptake, uncritical acceptance, ignore
- Brdiging challenges "authorship" looks more like "passing of ideas"
- Trajectories are not explicit or explictly aknowledged
- Is bridging related to "Transactive conversations" or Transacative Discusions as per X's definition
