Talk:ChroniclerC
From Egs Mayhem
ChroniclerC (Talk | contribs) (Yes, I know it looks scary when I go on editing sprees like that, but read this first.) |
ChroniclerC (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
- | Okay, yes, I went on another editing spree. But this time, instead of just removing links (bad me), I made two new sub-catagories to stick them in, Characters by Player and Characters by RP. If you don't like it, feel free to beat me with a stick and change it back; there's not much I can do to stop you on that second thing. --[[User:ChroniclerC|ChroniclerC]] 14:55, 15 February 2007 (EST) | + | Okay, yes, I went on another editing spree. But this time, instead of just removing links (bad me, I ''am'' sorry for that), I made two new sub-catagories to stick them in, Characters by Player and Characters by RP. If you don't like it, feel free to beat me with a stick and change it back; there's not much I can do to stop you on that second thing. --[[User:ChroniclerC|ChroniclerC]] 14:55, 15 February 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 19:56, 15 February 2007
CC, exactly what were you doing in all those edits? -PB
I actually PM'd him about this. Here's what he said:
"The clutter realy bothers me. I don't mind the minor categories and joke categories sitting around at the bottom of peoples pages, but when they clog up the serious pages it drives me nuts." —A Fan
Why don't you just take them off the serious pages, then, and leave the actual categories alone? -PB
Because the category pages were the serious pages I was talking about. Don't worry about it, though. I've given up. Make all the clutter you want, just keep it away from my pages. --ChroniclerC 13:01, 29 January 2007 (EST)
Okay, yes, I went on another editing spree. But this time, instead of just removing links (bad me, I am sorry for that), I made two new sub-catagories to stick them in, Characters by Player and Characters by RP. If you don't like it, feel free to beat me with a stick and change it back; there's not much I can do to stop you on that second thing. --ChroniclerC 14:55, 15 February 2007 (EST)