User:Heathin
From Create Your Own Story
m |
m |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| - | Questions can be mixed, such that they can be interpretations of the question before it. But all inquiries from the inquisitions then become a footstool on top of that grounding. Climb on the footstool and we are closer to the magnified, the previously unassailable, and lustrous truth. What it means to be: we can never be certain, however we are able to add to the concoction the Ego that we are closer to, or that we indeed are. Being the Ego allows us to engage with what aspects of life matter to us, and then meaning is certainly derived from this script. The script is a passive and prosaic document, and in it are the illusion of many signs in one place. If life is a script: then what is percieved as pure by us is what determines what we note as the long | + | Questions can be mixed, such that they can be interpretations of the question before it. But all inquiries from the inquisitions then become a footstool on top of that grounding. Climb on the footstool and we are closer to the magnified, the previously unassailable, and lustrous truth. What it means to be: we can never be certain, however we are able to add to the concoction the Ego that we are closer to, or that we indeed are. Being the Ego allows us to engage with what aspects of life matter to us, and then meaning is certainly derived from this script. The script is a passive and prosaic document, and in it are the illusion of many signs in one place. If life is a script: then what is percieved as pure by us is what determines what we note as the long expedition through the non-truths that we must go through. These non-truths however, which are seen as but dirt, are controversially the correct for others; for others they may be the boon, where as the boons we bore were as mud to them. |
Revision as of 07:02, 13 August 2016
--On Chemical Computers--
Some branches may be solemn or melancholy, dressed in thorns. If this is the path one evades, but is the path the self adjoins to: what is discursive to this is void. Everyone is in the competition to the stalk, getting there is battered with facticity. Going to the void is ultimately the eversion of knowledge itself, to renounce that stalk-answer is to renounce that ontological question. To renounce the ontological question is to disregard the emotional state of the self; soon after one realises that they are a chemical computer.
--On Muculent Treasures--
Questions can be mixed, such that they can be interpretations of the question before it. But all inquiries from the inquisitions then become a footstool on top of that grounding. Climb on the footstool and we are closer to the magnified, the previously unassailable, and lustrous truth. What it means to be: we can never be certain, however we are able to add to the concoction the Ego that we are closer to, or that we indeed are. Being the Ego allows us to engage with what aspects of life matter to us, and then meaning is certainly derived from this script. The script is a passive and prosaic document, and in it are the illusion of many signs in one place. If life is a script: then what is percieved as pure by us is what determines what we note as the long expedition through the non-truths that we must go through. These non-truths however, which are seen as but dirt, are controversially the correct for others; for others they may be the boon, where as the boons we bore were as mud to them.
