Talk:Marcus Character Sheet
From Ars Magica
(Difference between revisions)
JBforMarcus (Talk | contribs) (→Virtues) |
(→Flaws: Question) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Noted and corrected. I tend to play fast and loose with those guidelines, both because I aim for a concept and then try to implement and also because I'm not used to the limits yet, having grow up on previous editions. But as I say, tweaked. - JB | Noted and corrected. I tend to play fast and loose with those guidelines, both because I aim for a concept and then try to implement and also because I'm not used to the limits yet, having grow up on previous editions. But as I say, tweaked. - JB | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Optimistic (major version). Just wondering... (I know this is a canon flaw, which I personally feel is a bit weird, but there are a lot of weird flaws under 5th ed), why you took this as a major flaw and not a minor one. What do see as being the difference between the two levels?--[[User:Perikles|Perikles]] 10:13, 1 February 2006 (PST) | ||
===Virtues=== | ===Virtues=== | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 1 February 2006
Flaws
Just pointing out that a mage is only supposed to have 5 minor flaws and no more than 2 personality flaws. I had to check this myself on p.37, as I had got it wrong too.
Noted and corrected. I tend to play fast and loose with those guidelines, both because I aim for a concept and then try to implement and also because I'm not used to the limits yet, having grow up on previous editions. But as I say, tweaked. - JB
- Optimistic (major version). Just wondering... (I know this is a canon flaw, which I personally feel is a bit weird, but there are a lot of weird flaws under 5th ed), why you took this as a major flaw and not a minor one. What do see as being the difference between the two levels?--Perikles 10:13, 1 February 2006 (PST)
Virtues
Your minor magical focus needs to be defined. j
Good point. I forgot you all can't read my mind. Extensive footnote added - JB
