Talk:Second World War
From Acw
How do people feel about getting rid of Hitler? I can't really see things slowing to an entente with him still in the picture.
Possible deviations:
- Georg Elser's assassination attempt succeeding in 1939.
- A coup by Franz Halder, head of Wehrmacht General Staff, sometime in 1941-2.
- A White Rose Society assassination attempt in 1942.
- Moving the events of the July 20 plot (1944) forward a year or two.
I was thinking he survives the war but is relatively insane. Perhaps he is taken ill witgh a stroke in 1946 and while bedridden and insensate Doenitz and Hess coem to the negotiation table?
I was also thinking that after he is dead, while racist policy remains, the Final Solution stops, and they prefer deportation to murder. Make it his personal mania.
However, Himmler and the SS still effect genocide in their territories (as a polycratic state-within-a-state).Boots 00:48, 29 June 2006 (EDT)
It can't be assassination, if you want them to shut down the policy so closely associated with him so quickly. You can't question the word of a martyr. Most AH "Nazi's survive" fiction I've read has him go barmy, or pop an artery in heart or head either pre-Barbarossa or right before the end of the war.
--Konstantin Sovietyevich 00:13, 1 July 2006 (EDT)
I would prefer for Hitler to not only survive the War but to hang around competently. I don't know my WW2 history that well, but I think going down the insanity or quick death track is a cop out. It is far more unsettling if he ably administers Germany for a decade or so (provided this is remotely reasonable behaviour from Hitler) before retiring from public office due to illness or infirmity, but still holding vast influence until his death. For instance with imperial ambitions on Earth now and likely forever out of reach, does he turn his attention to space?
He should be a national hero of the Grossdeutschland, their should be a public holiday in his honour. There should also be Germans who do think he is a meglomanical tyrant best forgotten. We have four centuries to undo anything he does we don't like. --Shaun 22:52, 2 July 2006 (EDT)
I'd say a competent Hitler post-1945 is unlikely, given he appeared to become increasingly unstable and ill from 1943 onwards. Suggested causes include Parkinson's, amphetamine abuse, and syphilis. The actions of the historical Hitler aren't compatible with a negotiated armistice in 1946 - I can't see him accepting anything less than total victory or defeat. I think we should go with Boots' idea of an incapacitating stroke.
- Eckart von Kogel 22:46, 2 July 2006 (EDT)
Another option is that we write his 1943-44 instability as part of some subtle poisoning plot that is discovered and stopped, or as a prolonged psychotic episode/intensifying drug addiction that ends in a nervous breakdown, after the treatment of which he reverts to his maniacal but mostly competent pre-43 self. On the other hand, from the very start his career, he's a real death or glory type character, and I don't see anything but a radical character shift allowing him personally to make peace. Possibly the war is concluded by Goering during the months of his convalescence, and after ordering the Big G's execution, Hitler coolly decides that he might as well make good use of this "ceasefire" to prepare for the next big push - it just happens that the right moment never arises, what with the continual rebellions in the east, the massive rearmament of the USSR and the beginning of the space-race...
--Konstantin Sovietyevich 00:16, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
