User talk:Admin
From Acw
(Difference between revisions)
(→Categories: naming) |
m |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:: And should all man made space instalations be filed under '''space stations'''? Things like "space stations", "space ports", "ship yards", etc. | :: And should all man made space instalations be filed under '''space stations'''? Things like "space stations", "space ports", "ship yards", etc. | ||
::--[[User:Randall Sakai|Randall Sakai]] 22:14, 7 October 2006 (EDT) | ::--[[User:Randall Sakai|Randall Sakai]] 22:14, 7 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I think we need separate categories for Shipyards, spaceports etc. I also like Tom's idea of a 'space hub', which would be a planetdise port for ferrying things up to spaceports in orbit. I prefer Spacecraft, for space-borne ship. | ||
Revision as of 04:16, 8 October 2006
Categories
I hope you don't mind my creating a whole lot of categories and putting stuff in them. I see that you have started using them yourself, so it probably isn't a problem. :)
--Randall Sakai 21:09, 6 October 2006 (EDT)
- I don't, but I think "Space Fleets" shoudl be "Military Units".
- Boots 10:25, 7 October 2006 (EDT)
- Yeah, I wasn't quite sure about that (Spacefleet or something else).
- Another naming thing I had a query about: Do you like spaceship, space ship or space craft. Trying to think of a naming convention that will suit military and civilian, both manned and unmanned (I assume that they exist or will exist so trying to allow for expansion).
- And should all man made space instalations be filed under space stations? Things like "space stations", "space ports", "ship yards", etc.
- --Randall Sakai 22:14, 7 October 2006 (EDT)
- I think we need separate categories for Shipyards, spaceports etc. I also like Tom's idea of a 'space hub', which would be a planetdise port for ferrying things up to spaceports in orbit. I prefer Spacecraft, for space-borne ship.
