Section N
From 911answers
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*N.1. The 9/11 Commission | *N.1. The 9/11 Commission | ||
*N.2. National Institute of Standards and Technology | *N.2. National Institute of Standards and Technology | ||
| - | *N.3. | + | *N.3. Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| - | *N.4. | + | *N.4. Journalistic Investigations |
***N.4.1.100. The senior researcher on ''Popular Mechanics''' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff | ***N.4.1.100. The senior researcher on ''Popular Mechanics''' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff | ||
*N.5. Accountability | *N.5. Accountability | ||
***N.5.1.100. The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable. | ***N.5.1.100. The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable. | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 31 October 2006
Investigations
Introductory text here.
- N.1. The 9/11 Commission
- N.2. National Institute of Standards and Technology
- N.3. Federal Emergency Management Agency
- N.4. Journalistic Investigations
- N.4.1.100. The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff
- N.5. Accountability
- N.5.1.100. The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
