Section P
From 911answers
(Difference between revisions)
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* A 9/11 Government conspiracy wouldn’t require as many people as some seem to believe | * A 9/11 Government conspiracy wouldn’t require as many people as some seem to believe | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations? |
Current revision as of 02:31, 1 November 2006
[edit] Other 9/11 Claims
Introductory text here.
How should we organize this? More are likely to be asked in the future, so it should be somewhat flexible
- Isn't the official version a conspiracy theory?
- Pakistan’s ISI helped fund the 9/11 attacks, and America covered it up, perhaps to avoid an investigation of the cosy relationship between the ISI and CIA
- There were suspiciously few passengers on each of the hijacked planes
- If the attacks were supposed to kill the maximum number of people, then why not fly a plane into a nuclear power plant?
- Many supposedly dead passengers are not listed as killed in the Social Security Death Index
- The cellphone calls supposedly made from hijacked planes on 9/11 were faked
- The virtually indestructible black boxes all mysteriously disappeared
- A Bush-linked bank is given a record fine for laundering terrorist funds
- Bush and bin Ladin have financial interests in the Carlyle Group, which has made billions of profits from the Iraq war
- FAA records indicate two of the supposedly hijacked flights were not destroyed on 9/11
- A 9/11 Government conspiracy wouldn’t require as many people as some seem to believe
- Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
- Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?