Section N
From 911answers
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Investigations == | == Investigations == | ||
Introductory text here. | Introductory text here. | ||
| - | *The 9/11 Commission | + | |
| - | *National Institute of Standards and Technology | + | *N.1. The 9/11 Commission |
| - | *Federal Emergency Management Agency | + | *N.2. National Institute of Standards and Technology |
| - | *Journalistic Investigations | + | *N.3. *Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| - | **The senior researcher on ''Popular Mechanics''' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff | + | *N.4. *Journalistic Investigations |
| + | ***N.4.1.100. The senior researcher on ''Popular Mechanics''' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff | ||
| + | |||
| + | *N.5. Accountability | ||
| + | ***N.5.1.100. The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable. | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 31 October 2006
Investigations
Introductory text here.
- N.1. The 9/11 Commission
- N.2. National Institute of Standards and Technology
- N.3. *Federal Emergency Management Agency
- N.4. *Journalistic Investigations
- N.4.1.100. The senior researcher on Popular Mechanics' 9/11 debunking piece is the cousin of Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff
- N.5. Accountability
- N.5.1.100. The various responsible agencies - NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission - gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
