Talk:397

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(For)
(Against: voting against)
Line 26: Line 26:
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
 +
# [[User:Wooble|Wooble]] 08:48, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Abstain ===
=== Abstain ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|6|Add Abstention}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|6|Add Abstention}}

Revision as of 12:48, 31 May 2007

Proposed by: chuck 11:03, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary


I don't like the "wholly void" part; I think it should just be a simple rule of precedence in interpretation, letting the rest of the conflicting rule stand. I don't really like immutable rules anyway. And this is mostly to make myself active again per 362.

Debate

Add comments


Debate closed by chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT) -- the proposal must now be voted on.


Vote

For

Add FOR vote

  1. chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
  2. BobTHJ 12:54, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
  3. --Tucana25 00:08, 31 May 2007 (EDT)


Against

Add AGAINST vote

  1. Wooble 08:48, 31 May 2007 (EDT)


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools