Talk:392
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
m (I forgot to sign my comment) |
(→Debate: response to Darus67) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I see nothing inherently wrong with that. | I see nothing inherently wrong with that. | ||
--[[User:Darus67|Darus67]] 12:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:Darus67|Darus67]] 12:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: Yes, that was my intention. If you don't require hardly any labor from your citizens, then they will like you even better. I figured the equation should be more biased to losing popularity than gaining it, however, as popularity is already fairly easy to gain from Proposals. [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 12:28, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 16:28, 18 May 2007
Proposed By BobTHJ 11:21, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
A first attempt at setting up industry. This allows Canton Leaders to regulate the industry level of their canton. Set it too low, and you have little to no production. Set it too high and you will become unpopular (and as a result may lose your leadership position). May 25 is the closing of debate. BobTHJ 11:21, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Debate
Do you intend popularity to increase if the Industry Index is set very low? That will happen with the formula as written. I see nothing inherently wrong with that. --Darus67 12:18, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, that was my intention. If you don't require hardly any labor from your citizens, then they will like you even better. I figured the equation should be more biased to losing popularity than gaining it, however, as popularity is already fairly easy to gain from Proposals. BobTHJ 12:28, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
Vote
For
Against
Abstain
