Talk:Boundaries and roles
From Jsarmi
(Difference between revisions)
(Additional Cases?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::It might be that we are observing early stages of role formation/differentiation | ::It might be that we are observing early stages of role formation/differentiation | ||
::Understanding the dynamics of roles/activities move us closer to the design of activity systems (i.e. tasks, roles, resources) that are productive, but interaction is contingent on ist situatedness | ::Understanding the dynamics of roles/activities move us closer to the design of activity systems (i.e. tasks, roles, resources) that are productive, but interaction is contingent on ist situatedness | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Additional Cases? == | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 23 August 2007
Here is the plan:
- Define goals/questions
- Define Positioning theory, triangle, types of positioning , etc. -> Example?
- Data/Methods
- Case 1 T2/S2 then ask, is it stable? the same in sesssion 1, the same in session 3 or 4
- tell story of T2, with contrasting cases from 1 and 3 or 4
- tell story of T5 up to S4, contrast with case from S1
- Wonder about the community level
- Conclusions
- What do we gain: dynamics, mathematics, change
- It might be that we are observing early stages of role formation/differentiation
- Understanding the dynamics of roles/activities move us closer to the design of activity systems (i.e. tasks, roles, resources) that are productive, but interaction is contingent on ist situatedness
