Policy:user page control
From Cfcot
(→Discussion) |
m |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*I think people's pasts are their OWN BUSINESS and not the business of EGOTISTICAL PEOPLE like PERFECTION who dont think people can CHANGE. [[User:Fifty|Fifty]] 22:58, 8 February 2007 (IST) | *I think people's pasts are their OWN BUSINESS and not the business of EGOTISTICAL PEOPLE like PERFECTION who dont think people can CHANGE. [[User:Fifty|Fifty]] 22:58, 8 February 2007 (IST) | ||
| - | *I changed my mind. We should stop harping on the past. - [[User: | + | *I changed my mind. We should stop harping on the past. - [[User:Bill3000|Bill3000]] 03:21, 9 February 2007 (IST) |
[[Category: Policy_Articles]] | [[Category: Policy_Articles]] | ||
Revision as of 01:21, 9 February 2007
Contents |
Issue Summary
The question of how much control users should have over their personal pages has recently come to a head in a dispute over CivGeneral's personal page. CivGeneral asserts that he has the right to be the final arbiter of what goes on his page. This raises the question: how much control should a user have over his person page? Should he be able to remove truthful details that he finds unflattering? Should he be able to describe himself in a way that others would not agree to? This speaks to a deeper issue: should a user's page represent a database of encyclopedic knowledge, or a profile account for the forums?
Issue Bullets
- Should a user, or the public, decide what is on their personal page?
- Should a user's personal page represent a base of factual knowledge, or a personal profile?
Stating an opinion
To reply to this issue, please add it to the bottom of this portion of the page, above this page's categories. Either state your opinion or reply to someone else's. Make sure to sign your post with four tildes ("~~~~").
Discussion
- I would say that all disagreements about the truth of a statement should be reserved for the discussion page of each person's page. If you want to issue a general warning that you will not tolerate other people editing your page, then you should do so in the discussion. Tyke 03:42, 8 February 2007 (IST)
- Yes, disputes about the veracity of the statement should be referred to the article's discussion page. But there's a bigger issue than that. Should users be able to say, "this is true, but it can't go on my page?" Gogf 04:27, 8 February 2007 (IST)
- This shoudn't be a vanity site, this should give the basic rundown of each poster including potentially unflattering details. --Perfection 06:49, 8 February 2007 (IST)
- Posters should have control of their own articles, especialy if they dont want their personal histories used against them CivGeneral 10:35, 8 February 2007 (IST)
- I think people's pasts are their OWN BUSINESS and not the business of EGOTISTICAL PEOPLE like PERFECTION who dont think people can CHANGE. Fifty 22:58, 8 February 2007 (IST)
- I changed my mind. We should stop harping on the past. - Bill3000 03:21, 9 February 2007 (IST)
