Anonymous "insider" email about this

From Austin Bicycle Helmet Law

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-
APD really doesn't want this ordinance. This will also put an additional burden on the bike shops as they have to hand out information on the ordinance.
 
-
 
-
It would be good to have a list of the issues like:
 
-
 
-
How does a police officer apprehend and cite a cyclist without a helmet?
 
-
 
-
If the cyclists doesn't have identification what does that mean for the officer?
 
-
 
-
If the cyclist is too young to cite how does the officer deal with the child while he finds the parents?
 
-
 
-
Will the District Attorney support the prosecution of the offense?
 
-
 
-
If cyclists demand a jury trial what is going to happen and what will it cost?
 
-
 
-
Will the fines pay for the administration of the program?
 
-
 
-
How is a bicycle defined in the ordinance?
 
-
 
-
Does an adult on a tricycle have to wear a helmet?
 
-
 
-
The Bicycle definitions in the Transportation Code and the Health Code don't cover an adult tricycle or pedicab type vehicle.
 
-
 
-
We are probably talking about having some form of diversion program, what will that look like?
 
-
 
-
There are lots of questions that are going begging as we debate the efficacy of the helmet. This ordinance should fail of its own weight. Fighting over the value of a helmet in a crash is not going to get us much of anywhere. Everyone will point at the statement by Bruce Todd's doctor and blow off the rest of the argument.
 

Current revision as of 08:46, 4 July 2006

Personal tools